paper

Increasing the Size of Tame Shafarevich Groups

arXiv:2512.03327

Abstract

Let be a number field with a finite set of primes. We study the cohomology of -modules , in particular the Shafarevich groups $\Sha^i_S(K,A)$ for and tame sets , i.e., for sets that contain no primes above . When contains all primes above (the ``wild'' setting), it is a consequence of global Poitou--Tate duality that $\Sha^1_S(K,A')^\vee \simeq \Sha^2_S(K,A) \stackrel{\simeq}{\hookrightarrow} \RusB_S(K,A)$ is non-increasing as increases. A similar result holds when is replaced by its maximal pro- quotient . In [5] it was shown that for tame and with trivial action, the group $\Sha^2_S(K, \mathbb{F}_p)$ can increase as increases to , and even attain its maximal dimension, $\dim \RusB_S(K,\mathbb{F}_p)$, for carefully chosen . In the first part of this paper, we use Liu's definition [8] of $\RusB_S(K,A)$ for a general -module to show, assuming $\Sha^1_{all}(K,A')=0$, that $\Sha^2_S(K,A) \hookrightarrow \RusB_S(K,A)$. This happens, for example, when the action of on is through a finite group of order prime to . Under this extra assumption, we then strengthen the results of [5] to show that for any odd prime and any -module with tame, there exist infinitely many tame sets of primes of such that $\Sha^2_{S\cup X}(K,A) \stackrel{\simeq}{\hookrightarrow} \RusB_{S \cup X}(K,A) \stackrel{\simeq}{\twoheadleftarrow} \RusB_S(K,A) \hookleftarrow \Sha^2_S(K,A)$.

arXiv commentCorrected a mistake from the previous version; rewrote Section 2