Combinatorial Optimization using Comparison Oracles

Abstract

In linear combinatorial optimization, we aim to find $S^{\ast }=\arg {\min }_{S\in \mathcal{F}}⟨w,1_S⟩$ for a family $\mathcal{F}\subseteq 2^U$ over a ground set $U$ of $n$ elements. Traditionally, $w$ is known or accessible via a value oracle. Motivated by practical applications involving pairwise preferences, we study the weaker and more robust comparison oracle, which for any $S,T\in \mathcal{F}$ reveals only if $w(S)<,=,\text{ or }>w(T)$. We investigate the query complexity and computational efficiency of optimizing in this model. We present three main contributions. (1) Query Complexity: We establish that the query complexity over any arbitrary set system $\mathcal{F}\subseteq 2^U$ is $\tilde{O}(n^2)$. This demonstrates a fundamental separation between information and computational complexity, as the runtime may still be exponential for NP-hard problems. (2) Algorithmic Frameworks: We develop two general tools. First, a Dual Ellipsoid framework establishes an efficient reduction from optimization to certification. It shows that to optimize efficiently, it suffices to efficiently certify a candidate's optimality using only comparisons. Second, Global Subspace Learning (GSL) sorts all feasible sets using $O(nB\log (nB))$ queries for integer weights bounded by $B$. We efficiently implement GSL for linear matroids, yielding improved query complexities for problems like $k$-SUM, SUBSET-SUM, and $A+B$ sorting. (3) Combinatorial Applications: We give the first polynomial-time, low-query algorithms for classic problems, including minimum cuts, minimum weight spanning trees (and matroid bases), bipartite matching (and matroid intersection), and shortest $s$-$t$ paths. Our work provides the first general query complexity bounds and efficient algorithmic results for this fundamental model.