An Overview of Some Extensions of Mean Field Games beyond Perfect Homogeneity and Anonymity
arXiv:2511.04929 · doi:10.1007/s11432-025-4658-5
Abstract
The mean field games (MFG) paradigm was introduced to provide tractable approximations of games involving very large populations. The theory typically rests on two key assumptions: homogeneity, meaning that all players share the same dynamics and cost functions, and anonymity, meaning that each player interacts with others only through their empirical distribution. While these assumptions simplify the analysis, they can be restrictive for many applications. Fortunately, several extensions of the standard MFG framework that relax these assumptions have been developed in the literature. The purpose of these notes is to offer a pedagogical introduction to such models. In particular, we discuss multi-population MFGs, graphon MFGs, major-minor MFGs, and Stackelberg MFGs, as well as variants involving cooperative players.
References in corpus (9)
- Existence of independent random matching
- Graphon Mean Field Games and the GMFG Equations
- Linear Quadratic Graphon Field Games
- Incentives, lockdown, and testing: from Thucydides's analysis to the COVID-19 pandemic
- Optimal and Approximate Solutions to Linear Quadratic Regulation of a Class of Graphon Dynamical Systems
- Mean Field LQG Social Optimization: A Reinforcement Learning Approach
- Hypergraphon Mean Field Games
- Concentration of measure for Graphon particle system
- Computational investigations of a multi-class traffic flow model: mean-field and microscopic dynamics