paper

Joins of closed sublocales are not always a coframe

arXiv:2510.00987 · doi:10.1007/s11083-025-09725-w

Abstract

Given a locale , the collection of joins of closed sublocales forms a frame--somewhat unexpectedly, as it is naturally embedded in the coframe of all sublocales of , where by coframe we mean the order-theoretic dual of a frame. This construction has attracted attention in point-free topology: as a maximal essential extension in the category of frames, for its (non-)functorial properties, its relation to canonical extensions and exact filters of frames, etc. A central open question of the theory, posed by Picado, Pultr, and Tozzi in 2019, asked whether is always a coframe, or whether there exists a locale for which this fails. In this paper, we resolve this question in the negative by constructing a locale such that is not a coframe. The main challenge in such questions lies in the difficulty of understanding exact infima in ; we circumvent this by analysing a certain separation property satisfied by .