Unraveling the temporal dependence of ecological interaction measures

Abstract

Identifying the network of species interactions is a fundamental step toward understanding ecosystem stability and biodiversity. However, the interpretability of empirical interaction measures remains a major challenge. Experimental estimates frequently exhibit puzzling temporal fluctuations, including sign shifts typically interpreted as transitions between competition and facilitation. Here, we analyze the temporal behavior of pairwise interaction measures to demonstrate that these fluctuations - and apparent shifts in ecological roles - can emerge intrinsically from standard population dynamics, without any underlying change in the actual ecological relationships. We show that inferred interactions are heavily distorted by experimental protocol choices, particularly the duration of observation and microbial growth constraints. By systematically evaluating interactions across timescales, we uncover a principled mechanism to mitigate these biases: short-term measurements reliably isolate direct, pairwise species couplings, whereas longer-term observations inevitably absorb indirect community feedbacks and systemic experimental constraints. By disentangling direct couplings from indirect network effects, our framework provides a robust, timescale-aware approach to interpreting empirical interaction matrices, offering critical quantitative guidance for experimental design and predictive ecosystem modeling.