paper

Operations that are incompatible with certain systems of translates in

arXiv:2508.16529

Abstract

We say that closed subspace of admits a \emph{complete set of semi-regular a-translates} if there exist some , finitely many functions , some subsets of and some finite subsets $\set{\al_{1j}}_{j=1}^{K_1},\dots,\set{\al_{Nj}}_{j=1}^{K_N}$ of such that $$M=\clspan{\bigset{g_i(\cdot-ak), ~g_i(\cdot-\al_{ij})\,|\,k\in J_i,1\leq j\leq K_i\,}}_{i=1}^N.$$ Here denotes a generic variable. In the first half of this paper, we study whether the properties of being closed under modulation, dilation, reflection or Fourier transform is compatible with the existence of a complete set of semi-regular -translates in closed subspaces of . Specifically, we prove that a closed subspace of does not admit a complete set of semi-regular -translates if it is closed under modulation or if it is closed under dilation with respect to a scaling factor satisfying We also show that no infinite-dimensional closed subspace of can simultaneously be closed under Fourier transform and admit a complete set of semi-regular -translates with $a^2\in \Q$, whereas for any , there do exist closed subspaces that are closed under reflection and admit a complete set of semi-regular -translates. In the second half of this paper, we prove that a closed subspace of does not admit a frame formed by a system of translates if it contains a closed subspace that is closed under modulation and contains a nonzero function in . In addition, we present related results concerning the incompatibility between being closed under Fourier transform and the existence of frames or Schauder bases of translates in closed subspaces of . All results in this half can be extended to for any

We thank the anonymous comments that helped us identify and correct serious errors in an earlier version of this manuscript