Quantifying the impact of detection bias from blended galaxies on cosmic shear surveys
arXiv:2507.01546 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556116
Abstract
Increasingly large areas in cosmic shear surveys lead to a reduction of statistical errors, necessitating to control systematic errors increasingly better. One of these systematic effects was initially studied by Hartlap et al. in 2011, namely that image overlap with (bright foreground) galaxies may prevent some distant (source) galaxies to remain undetected. Since this overlap is more likely to occur in regions of high foreground density -- which tend to be the regions in which the shear is largest -- this detection bias would cause an underestimation of the estimated shear correlation function. This detection bias adds to the possible systematic of image blending, where nearby pairs or multiplets of images render shear estimates more uncertain and thus may cause a reduction in their statistical weight. Based on simulations with data from the Kilo-Degree Survey, we study the conditions under which images are not detected. We find an approximate analytic expression for the detection probability in terms of the separation and brightness ratio to the neighbouring galaxies. Applying this fitting formula to weak lensing ray tracing through, and the galaxy distribution in the Millennium Simulation, we estimate that the detection bias alone leads to an underestimate of by almost 2\% and can therefore not be neglected in current and forthcoming cosmic shear surveys.
arXiv comment9 pages, 6 figures, submitted to A&A
References in corpus (28)
- Simulating the joint evolution of quasars, galaxies and their large-scale distribution
- Weak Gravitational Lensing
- The COSMOS2015 Catalog: Exploring the 1<z<6 Universe with half a million galaxies
- KiDS-1000 Cosmology: Cosmic shear constraints and comparison between two point statistics
- Galaxy formation in the Planck Cosmology - I. Matching the observed evolution of star formation rates, colours and stellar masses
- The Kilo-Degree Survey
- Ray-tracing through the Millennium Simulation: Born corrections and lens-lens coupling in cosmic shear and galaxy-galaxy lensing
- The Skewness of the Aperture Mass Statistic
- The fourth data release of the Kilo-Degree Survey: ugri imaging and nine-band optical-IR photometry over 1000 square degrees
- The first and second data releases of the Kilo-Degree Survey
- Analysis of two-point statistics of cosmic shear: I. Estimators and covariances
- KiDS-1000 catalogue: Redshift distributions and their calibration
- Weak lensing shear calibration with simulations of the HSC survey
- DES Y3 results: Blending shear and redshift biases in image simulations
- Photometric Redshift Calibration with Self Organising Maps
- AMICO galaxy clusters in KiDS-DR3: sample properties and selection function
- Precision simulation of ground-based lensing data using observations from space
- AMICO: optimised detection of galaxy clusters in photometric surveys
- A study of the sensitivity of shape measurements to the input parameters of weak lensing image simulations
- Euclid Preparation IV. Impact of undetected galaxies on weak-lensing shear measurements
- Mitigating Shear-dependent Object Detection Biases with Metacalibration
- Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: The Impact of Galaxy Neighbours on Weak Lensing Cosmology with im3shape
- A bias in cosmic shear from galaxy selection: results from ray-tracing simulations
- KiDS-Legacy calibration: unifying shear and redshift calibration with the SKiLLS multi-band image simulations
- Constraining the masses of high-redshift clusters with weak lensing: Revised shape calibration testing for the impact of stronger shears and increased blending
- The SRG/eROSITA All-Sky Survey: Weak-Lensing of eRASS1 Galaxy Clusters in KiDS-1000 and Consistency Checks with DES Y3 & HSC-Y3
- Monitoring the photometric behavior of OmegaCAM with Astro-WISE
- Blending effects on shear measurement synergy between Euclid-like and LSST-like surveys