Biases from Missing a Small Planet in High Multiplicity Systems
arXiv:2504.21763 · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adcba1
Abstract
In an era when we are charting multiple planets per system, one might wonder the extent to which "missing" (or failing to detect) a planet can skew our interpretation of the system architecture. We address this question with a simple experiment: starting from a large, homogeneous catalog, we remove planets and monitor how several well-defined metrics of the system architecture change. We first perform this test on a catalog of observed exoplanets. We then repeat our test on a catalog of synthetic planetary systems with underlying hyperparameters that have been fit to reproduce the observed systems as faithfully as possible (though imperfectly). For both samples, we find that the failure to detect one or more planets tends to create more irregularly spaced planets, whereas the planet mass similarity and coplanarity are essentially unaffected. One key difference between the synthetic and observed data sets is that the observed systems have more evenly spaced planets than the observation-bias-applied synthetic systems. Since our tests show that detection bias tends to increase irregularity in spacing, the even spacing in the observed planetary systems is likely astrophysical rather than the result of the Kepler missions' inherent detection biases. Our findings support the interpretation that planets in the same system have similar sizes and regular spacing and reinforce the need to develop an underlying model of planetary architectures that reproduces these observed patterns.
References in corpus (25)
- Probabilistic Forecasting of the Masses and Radii of Other Worlds
- The California Kepler Survey VII. Precise Planet Radii Leveraging Gaia DR2 Reveal the Stellar Mass Dependence of the Planet Radius Gap
- Identifying Exoplanets with Deep Learning: A Five Planet Resonant Chain around Kepler-80 and an Eighth Planet around Kepler-90
- The California-Kepler Survey V. Peas in a Pod: Planets in a Kepler Multi-planet System are Similar in Size and Regularly Spaced
- Almost All of Kepler's Multiple Planet Candidates are Planets
- About 30% of Sun-like Stars Have Kepler-like Planetary Systems: A Study of their Intrinsic Architecture
- A Study of the Shortest-Period Planets Found With Kepler
- The Exoplanet Population Observation Simulator. I - The Inner Edges of Planetary Systems
- Validation of Kepler's Multiple Planet Candidates. II: Refined Statistical Framework and Descriptions of Systems of Special Interest
- Kepler Multi-Planet Systems Exhibit Unexpected Intra-system Uniformity in Mass and Radius
- Architectures of Exoplanetary Systems. I: A Clustered Forward Model for Exoplanetary Systems around Kepler's FGK Stars
- Architectures of Exoplanetary Systems. III: Eccentricity and Mutual Inclination Distributions of AMD-stable Planetary Systems
- A 1.9 Earth radius rocky planet and the discovery of a non-transiting planet in the Kepler-20 system
- An information theoretic framework for classifying exoplanetary system architectures
- The Kepler Giant Planet Search. I: A Decade of Kepler Planet-host Radial Velocities from W. M. Keck Observatory
- The Kepler Peas in a Pod Pattern is Astrophysical
- The multiplicity distribution of Kepler's exoplanets
- On the patterns observed in Kepler multi-planet systems
- Energy Optimization in Extrasolar Planetary Systems: The Transition from Peas-in-a-Pod to Runaway Growth
- AutoRegressive Planet Search: Application to the Kepler Mission
- Peas in a Pod? Radius correlations in Kepler multi-planet systems
- Inner Planetary System Gap Complexity is a Predictor of Outer Giant Planets
- Edge-of-the-Multis: Evidence for a Transition in the Outer Architectures of Compact Multi-Planet Systems
- Pairwise Tidal Equilibrium States and the Architecture of Extrasolar Planetary Systems
- Updated Catalog of Kepler Planet Candidates: Focus on Accuracy and Orbital Periods