Astrophysical constraints on the simulation hypothesis for this Universe: why it is (nearly) impossible that we live in a simulation

Abstract

We assess how physically realistic the ''simulation hypothesis'' for this Universe is, based on physical constraints arising from the link between information and energy, and on known astrophysical constraints. We investigate three cases: the simulation of the entire visible Universe, the simulation of Earth only, or a low resolution simulation of Earth, compatible with high-energy neutrino observations. In all cases, the amounts of energy or power required by any version of the simulation hypothesis are entirely incompatible with physics, or (literally) astronomically large, even in the lowest resolution case. Only universes with very different physical properties can produce some version of this Universe as a simulation. On the other hand, our results show that it is just impossible that this Universe is simulated by a universe sharing the same properties, regardless of technological advancements of the far future.

17 pages, 4 figures. Frontiers in Physics, in press

References in corpus (9)

• Properties of galaxies reproduced by a hydrodynamic simulation
• Shocks and cold fronts in galaxy clusters
• Study of Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Ray Composition Using Telescope Array's Middle Drum Detector and Surface Array in Hybrid Mode
• An upper limit to the energy of gamma-ray bursts indicates that GRB/SNe are powered by magnetars
• The neutrino background from non-jetted active galactic nuclei
• Extragalactic neutrino factories
• On the complexity and the information content of cosmic structures
• How complex is the cosmic web?
• The Forward Physics Facility at the HL-LHC and its Synergies with Astroparticle Physics