Physical significance of artificial numerical noise in direct numerical simulation of turbulence
arXiv:2504.04048 · doi:10.1017/jfm.2025.200
Abstract
Using clean numerical simulation (CNS) in which artificial numerical noise is negligible over a finite, sufficiently long interval of time, we provide evidence, for the first time, that artificial numerical noise in direct numerical simulation (DNS) of turbulence is approximately equivalent to thermal fluctuation and/or stochastic environmental noise. This confers physical significance on the artificial numerical noise of DNS of the Navier-Stokes equations. As a result, DNS on a fine mesh should correspond to turbulence under small internal/external physical disturbance, whereas DNS on a sparse mesh corresponds to turbulent flow under large physical disturbance, respectively. The key point is that: all of them have physical meanings and so are correct in terms of their deterministic physics, even if their statistics are quite different. This is illustrated herein. Our paper provides a positive viewpoint regarding the presence of artificial numerical noise in DNS.
16 pages, 12 figures
References in corpus (6)
- Chaos and predictability of homogeneous-isotropic turbulence
- Thermal Fluctuations in the Dissipation Range of Homogeneous Isotropic Turbulence
- Large-scale influence of numerical noises as artificial stochastic disturbances on a sustained turbulence
- The production of uncertainty in three-dimensional Navier-Stokes turbulence
- Is a direct numerical simulation (DNS) of Navier-Stokes equations with small enough grid spacing and time-step definitely reliable/correct?
- Lifetimes of metastable windy states in two-dimensional Rayleigh-Bénard convection with stress-free boundaries