When to Boost: How Dose Timing Determines the Epidemic Threshold

Abstract

Most vaccines require multiple doses, the first to induce recognition and antibody production and subsequent doses to boost the primary response and achieve optimal protection. We show that properly prioritizing the administration of first and second doses can shift the epidemic threshold, separating the disease-free from the endemic state and potentially preventing widespread outbreaks. Assuming homogeneous mixing, we prove that at a low vaccination rate, the best strategy is to give absolute priority to first doses. In contrast, for high vaccination rates, we propose a scheduling that outperforms a first-come first-served approach. We identify the threshold that separates these two scenarios and derive the optimal prioritization scheme and inter-dose interval. Agent-based simulations on real and synthetic contact networks validate our findings. We provide specific guidelines for effective resource allocation, showing that adjusting the timing between primer and booster significantly impacts epidemic outcomes and can determine whether the disease persists or disappears.

5 pages, 5 figures

References in corpus (8)

• Immunization of complex networks
• Statistical physics of vaccination
• Non-pharmaceutical interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid review
• Self-similarity of complex networks and hidden metric spaces
• EoN (Epidemics on Networks): a fast, flexible Python package for simulation, analytic approximation, and analysis of epidemics on networks
• Sampling methods for the quasistationary regime of epidemic processes on regular and complex networks
• Simple quasistationary method for simulations of epidemic processes with localized states
• Rebound in epidemic control: How misaligned vaccination timing amplifies infection peaks