Of pashas, popes, and indivisibles
arXiv:2502.11145 · doi:10.1017/S0269889725000456
Abstract
The studies of Bonaventura Cavalieri's indivisibles by Giusti, Andersen, Mancosu and others provide a comprehensive picture of Cavalieri's mathematics, as well as of the mathematical objections to it as formulated by Paul Guldin and other critics. An issue that has been studied in less detail concerns the theological underpinnings of the contemporary debate over indivisibles, its historical roots, the geopolitical situation at the time, and its relation to the ultimate suppression of Cavalieri's religious order. We analyze sources from the 17th through 21st centuries to investigate such a relation.
39 pages; to appear in Science in Context
References in corpus (8)
- Procedures of Leibnizian infinitesimal calculus: An account in three modern frameworks
- Two-track depictions of Leibniz's fictions
- Gregory's sixth operation
- Leibniz on bodies and infinities: rerum natura and mathematical fictions
- Mathematical conquerors, Unguru polarity, and the task of history
- Fermat's dilemma: Why did he keep mum on infinitesimals? and the European theological context
- Is pluralism in the history of mathematics possible?
- When does a hyperbola meet its asymptote? Bounded infinities, fictions, and contradictions in Leibniz