Computational models of learning and synaptic plasticity
arXiv:2412.05501 · doi:10.1016/B978-0-443-15754-7.00078-X
Abstract
Many mathematical models of synaptic plasticity have been proposed to explain the diversity of plasticity phenomena observed in biological organisms. These models range from simple interpretations of Hebb's postulate, which suggests that correlated neural activity leads to increases in synaptic strength, to more complex rules that allow bidirectional synaptic updates, ensure stability, or incorporate additional signals like reward or error. At the same time, a range of learning paradigms can be observed behaviorally, from Pavlovian conditioning to motor learning and memory recall. Although it is difficult to directly link synaptic updates to learning outcomes experimentally, computational models provide a valuable tool for building evidence of this connection. In this chapter, we discuss several fundamental learning paradigms, along with the synaptic plasticity rules that might be used to implement them.
arXiv commentChapter for reference textbook on learning and memory
References in corpus (8)
- Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks
- On Hyperparameter Optimization of Machine Learning Algorithms: Theory and Practice
- Eligibility Traces and Plasticity on Behavioral Time Scales: Experimental Support of neoHebbian Three-Factor Learning Rules
- Using Fast Weights to Attend to the Recent Past
- On a model of associative memory with huge storage capacity
- Large Associative Memory Problem in Neurobiology and Machine Learning
- Hierarchical Associative Memory
- Memory capacity of neural network models