Auditing for Bias in Ad Delivery Using Inferred Demographic Attributes
arXiv:2410.23394 · doi:10.1145/3715275.3732172
Abstract
Auditing social-media algorithms has become a focus of public-interest research and policymaking to ensure their fairness across demographic groups such as race, age, and gender in consequential domains such as the presentation of employment opportunities. However, such demographic attributes are often unavailable to auditors and platforms. When demographics data is unavailable, auditors commonly infer them from other available information. In this work, we study the effects of inference error on auditing for bias in one prominent application: black-box audit of ad delivery using paired ads. We show that inference error, if not accounted for, causes auditing to falsely miss skew that exists. We then propose a way to mitigate the inference error when evaluating skew in ad delivery algorithms. Our method works by adjusting for expected error due to demographic inference, and it makes skew detection more sensitive when attributes must be inferred. Because inference is increasingly used for auditing, our results provide an important addition to the auditing toolbox to promote correct audits of ad delivery algorithms for bias. While the impact of attribute inference on accuracy has been studied in other domains, our work is the first to consider it for black-box evaluation of ad delivery bias, when only aggregate data is available to the auditor.
Published in ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 2025 (ACM FAccT 2025)
References in corpus (10)
- Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?
- Discrimination through optimization: How Facebook's ad delivery can lead to skewed outcomes
- Explore Spatiotemporal and Demographic Characteristics of Human Mobility via Twitter: A Case Study of Chicago
- Fairness Under Unawareness: Assessing Disparity When Protected Class Is Unobserved
- Auditing for Discrimination in Algorithms Delivering Job Ads
- Awareness in Practice: Tensions in Access to Sensitive Attribute Data for Antidiscrimination
- Algorithms that "Don't See Color": Comparing Biases in Lookalike and Special Ad Audiences
- Towards Fairness in Personalized Ads Using Impression Variance Aware Reinforcement Learning
- Auditing for Racial Discrimination in the Delivery of Education Ads
- When Fair Classification Meets Noisy Protected Attributes