Distribution-free uncertainty quantification for inverse problems: application to weak lensing mass mapping

Abstract

In inverse problems, distribution-free uncertainty quantification (UQ) aims to obtain error bars with coverage guarantees that are independent of any prior assumptions about the data distribution. In the context of mass mapping, uncertainties could lead to errors that affects our understanding of the underlying mass distribution, or could propagate to cosmological parameter estimation, thereby impacting the precision and reliability of cosmological models. Current surveys, such as Euclid or Rubin, will provide new weak lensing datasets of very high quality. Accurately quantifying uncertainties in mass maps is therefore critical to perform reliable cosmological parameter inference. In this paper, we extend the conformalized quantile regression (CQR) algorithm, initially proposed for scalar regression, to inverse problems. We compare our approach with another distribution-free approach based on risk-controlling prediction sets (RCPS). Both methods are based on a calibration dataset, and offer finite-sample coverage guarantees that are independent of the data distribution. Furthermore, they are applicable to any mass mapping method, including blackbox predictors. In our experiments, we apply UQ on three mass-mapping method: the Kaiser-Squires inversion, iterative Wiener filtering, and the MCALens algorithm. Our experiments reveal that RCPS tends to produce overconservative confidence bounds with small calibration sets, whereas CQR is designed to avoid this issue. Although the expected miscoverage rate is guaranteed to stay below a user-prescribed threshold regardless of the mass mapping method, selecting an appropriate reconstruction algorithm remains crucial for obtaining accurate estimates, especially around peak-like structures, which are particularly important for inferring cosmological parameters. Additionally, the choice of mass mapping method influences the size of the error bars.

Accepted for publication in Astronomy & Astrophysics

References in corpus (25)

• Cosmology with cosmic shear observations: a review
• COSMOS : Hubble Space Telescope Observations
• Evidence for the accelerated expansion of the Universe from weak lensing tomography with COSMOS
• Estimating conditional quantiles with the help of the pinball loss
• Cosmology Constraints from the Weak Lensing Peak Counts and the Power Spectrum in CFHTLenS
• Least Ambiguous Set-Valued Classifiers with Bounded Error Levels
• Photometric Redshifts of Galaxies in COSMOS
• Probing Cosmology with Weak Lensing Peak Counts
• Likelihood-free inference with neural compression of DES SV weak lensing map statistics
• Weak lensing cosmology with convolutional neural networks on noisy data
• Uncertainty quantification for radio interferometric imaging: I. proximal MCMC methods
• Deep learning dark matter map reconstructions from DES SV weak lensing data
• High Resolution Weak Lensing Mass-Mapping Combining Shear and Flexion
• Weak lensing mass map and peak statistics in Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Stripe 82 survey
• The cosmological information of shear peaks: beyond the abundance
• Uncertainty quantification for radio interferometric imaging: II. MAP estimation
• $\kappa$TNG: Effect of Baryonic Processes on Weak Lensing with IllustrisTNG Simulations
• Noise reduction for weak lensing mass mapping: An application of generative adversarial networks to Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam first-year data
• Denoising Weak Lensing Mass Maps with Deep Learning
• Probabilistic Mass Mapping with Neural Score Estimation
• Weak lensing mass reconstruction using sparsity and a Gaussian random field
• Sparsity and the Bayesian Perspective
• Sparse Bayesian mass-mapping with uncertainties: local credible intervals
• CMB map restoration
• Uncertainty-Aware Blob Detection with an Application to Integrated-Light Stellar Population Recoveries

Cited by in corpus (1)

• A plug-and-play approach with fast uncertainty quantification for weak lensing mass mapping