A meta-analysis of impact factors of astrophysics journals

Abstract

We calculate the 2024 impact factors for the 38 most widely used journals in Astrophysics, using the citations collated by NASA/ADS (Astrophysics Data System) and compare them to the official impact factors. This includes journals which publish papers outside of astrophysics such as PRD, EPJC, Nature, etc. We also propose a new metric to gauge the impact factor based on the median number of citations in a journal and calculate the same for all the journals. We find that the ADS-based impact factors are mostly in agreement, albeit higher than the official impact factors for most journals. The journals with the maximum fractional difference in median-based and old impact factors are JHEAP and PTEP. We find the maximum difference between the ADS and official impact factor for Nature.

arXiv comment10 pages, 2 figures. More journals added. Also added miscellaneous publication statistics as well as APC details. Accepted for publication in EPJP

References in corpus (5)

• The TianQin project: current progress on science and technology
• Implications for the Hubble tension from the ages of the oldest astrophysical objects
• The NASA Astrophysics Data System: Overview
• A measure of total research impact independent of time and discipline
• Astronomy's Greatest Hits: The 100 most Cited Papers in Each Year of the First Decade of the 21st Century (2000 - 2009)