Comparison of Gravity with Type Ia Supernovae Data
arXiv:2410.01967 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.024074
Abstract
The expansion of the universe in gravity is studied. By focusing on functions of the form , we assert that present day acceleration can be achieved if the functional form of either grows slowly or falls as a function of . In particular, we demonstrate that when , the universe transitions to exponential growth at late times, just as it does in the standard cosmological model. A comparison of predictions of this model, with Type Ia supernovae shows that this model fits the data as well or even slightly better than the standard cosmological model without increasing the number of parameters.
arXiv comment10 pages, 3 figures
References in corpus (18)
- Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant
- Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae
- The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample
- f(R,T) gravity
- The Complete Light-curve Sample of Spectroscopically Confirmed Type Ia Supernovae from Pan-STARRS1 and Cosmological Constraints from The Combined Pantheon Sample
- Discovery of a Supernova Explosion at Half the Age of the Universe and its Cosmological Implications
- Action functionals for relativistic perfect fluids
- First Cosmology Results using Type Ia Supernovae from the Dark Energy Survey: Constraints on Cosmological Parameters
- Dark Matter From f(R,T) Gravity
- Stellar equilibrium configurations of white dwarfs in the gravity
- Strange stars in gravity
- New derivation of the Lagrangian of a perfect fluid with a barotropic equation of state
- Cosmological inviability of gravity
- Reexamining gravity
- Constraining gravity models using type Ia supernovae
- General approach to the Lagrangian ambiguity in gravity
- Constraints on Cosmological Parameters with a Sample of Type Ia Supernovae from JWST
- Are theories really relevant to cosmology?