"Come to us first": Centering Community Organizations in Artificial Intelligence for Social Good Partnerships
arXiv:2409.06814 · doi:10.1145/3687009
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence for Social Good (AI4SG) has emerged as a growing body of research and practice exploring the potential of AI technologies to tackle social issues. This area emphasizes interdisciplinary partnerships with community organizations, such as non-profits and government agencies. However, amidst excitement about new advances in AI and their potential impact, the needs, expectations, and aspirations of these community organizations--and whether they are being met--are not well understood. Understanding these factors is important to ensure that the considerable efforts by AI teams and community organizations can actually achieve the positive social impact they strive for. Drawing on the Data Feminism framework, we explored the perspectives of community organization members on their partnerships with AI teams through 16 semi-structured interviews. Our study highlights the pervasive influence of funding agendas and the optimism surrounding AI's potential. Despite the significant intellectual contributions and labor provided by community organization members, their goals were frequently sidelined in favor of other stakeholders, including AI teams. While many community organization members expected tangible project deployment, only two out of 14 projects we studied reached the deployment stage. However, community organization members sustained their belief in the potential of the projects, still seeing diminished goals as valuable. To enhance the efficacy of future collaborations, our participants shared their aspirations for success, calling for co-leadership starting from the early stages of projects. We propose data co-liberation as a grounding principle for approaching AI4SG moving forward, positing that community organizations' co-leadership is essential for fostering more effective, sustainable, and ethical development of AI.
Accepted to the Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact. 8, CSCW2
References in corpus (10)
- Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?
- Envisioning Communities: A Participatory Approach Towards AI for Social Good
- Seeing Like a Toolkit: How Toolkits Envision the Work of AI Ethics
- Investigating How Practitioners Use Human-AI Guidelines: A Case Study on the People + AI Guidebook
- Exploring How Machine Learning Practitioners (Try To) Use Fairness Toolkits
- Understanding Practices, Challenges, and Opportunities for User-Engaged Algorithm Auditing in Industry Practice
- `It is currently hodgepodge'': Examining AI/ML Practitioners' Challenges during Co-production of Responsible AI Values
- How Platform-User Power Relations Shape Algorithmic Accountability: A Case Study of Instant Loan Platforms and Financially Stressed Users in India
- (Un)making AI Magic: a Design Taxonomy
- AI for Social Impact: Learning and Planning in the Data-to-Deployment Pipeline