Distinguishing Signature of Kerr-MOG Black Hole and Superspinar via Lense-Thirring Precession

Abstract

We examine the geometrical differences between the black hole~(BH) and naked singularity~(NS) or superspinar via Lense-Thirring~(LT) precession in spinning modified-gravity~(MOG). For BH case, we show that the LT precession frequency~(${\Omega }_{LT}$) along the pole is proportional to the angular-momentum~($J$) parameter or spin parameter~($a$) and is inversely proportional to the cubic value of radial distance parameter, and also governed by Eq.(1). Along the equatorial plane it is governed by Eq.(2). While for superspinar, we show that the LT precession frequency is inversely proportional to the cubic value of the spin parameter and it decreases with distance by MOG parameter as derived in Eq.(3) at the pole and in the limit $a>>r$ (where $\alpha$ is MOG parameter). For $\theta \ne \frac{\pi }{2}$ and in the superspinar limit, the spin frequency varies as ${\Omega }_{LT}\propto \frac{1}{a^3{\cos }^4\theta }$ and by Eq.(38)

11 pages, 16 figures, Accepted in EPJC

References in corpus (10)

• Gravity Probe B: Final Results of a Space Experiment to Test General Relativity
• Black Holes in Modified Gravity (MOG)
• Test bodies and naked singularities: is the self-force the cosmic censor?
• Modified Gravity Black Holes and their Observable Shadows
• Incidences between points and lines on a two-dimensional variety
• Destroying a near-extremal Kerr-Newman black hole
• Overspinning a Kerr black hole: the effect of self-force
• Circular orbits in Kerr-Taub-NUT spacetime and their implications for accreting black holes and naked singularities
• Naked singularity, firewall, and Hawking radiation
• How small can an over-spinning body be in general relativity?

Cited by in corpus (1)

• Distinguishing Black Hole and Naked Singularity in MOG via Inertial Frame Dragging Effect