Detection of decision-making manipulation in the pairwise comparisons method
arXiv:2405.16693 · doi:10.3390/app14198946
Abstract
Most decision-making models, including the pairwise comparison method, assume the decision-makers honesty. However, it is easy to imagine a situation where a decision-maker tries to manipulate the ranking results. This paper presents three simple manipulation methods in the pairwise comparison method. We then try to detect these methods using appropriately constructed neural networks. Experimental results accompany the proposed solutions on the generated data, showing a considerable manipulation detection level.
19 pages, 5 figures, 2 tables
References in corpus (9)
- Axiomatic properties of inconsistency indices for pairwise comparisons
- Quantifying incentive (in)compatibility: A case study from sports
- An Algorithm for the Optimal Consistent Approximation to a Pairwise Comparisons Matrix by Orthogonal Projections
- Inconsistency indices for incomplete pairwise comparisons matrices
- Towards quantification of incompleteness in the pairwise comparisons method
- Axiomatizations of inconsistency indices for triads
- A lexicographically optimal completion for pairwise comparison matrices with missing entries
- Towards secure judgments aggregation in AHP
- Almost optimal manipulation of a pair of alternatives