Linguistically Differentiating Acts and Recalls of Racial Microaggressions on Social Media

Abstract

In this work, we examine the linguistic signature of online racial microaggressions (acts) and how it differs from that of personal narratives recalling experiences of such aggressions (recalls) by Black social media users. We manually curate and annotate a corpus of acts and recalls from in-the-wild social media discussions, and verify labels with Black workshop participants. We leverage Natural Language Processing (NLP) and qualitative analysis on this data to classify (RQ1), interpret (RQ2), and characterize (RQ3) the language underlying acts and recalls of racial microaggressions in the context of racism in the U.S. Our findings show that neural language models (LMs) can classify acts and recalls with high accuracy (RQ1) with contextual words revealing themes that associate Blacks with objects that reify negative stereotypes (RQ2). Furthermore, overlapping linguistic signatures between acts and recalls serve functionally different purposes (RQ3), providing broader implications to the current challenges in content moderation systems on social media.

36 pages

References in corpus (6)

• Expanding Explainability: Towards Social Transparency in AI systems
• Mediating Community-AI Interaction through Situated Explanation: The Case of AI-Led Moderation
• RECAST: Enabling User Recourse and Interpretability of Toxicity Detection Models with Interactive Visualization
• Awe Versus Aww: The Effectiveness of Two Kinds of Positive Emotional Stimulation on Stress Reduction for Online Content Moderators
• ModSandbox: Facilitating Online Community Moderation Through Error Prediction and Improvement of Automated Rules
• Same Words, Different Meanings: Semantic Polarization in Broadcast Media Language Forecasts Polarization on Social Media Discourse