The Ethics of ChatGPT in Medicine and Healthcare: A Systematic Review on Large Language Models (LLMs)
arXiv:2403.14473 · doi:10.1038/s41746-024-01157-x
Abstract
With the introduction of ChatGPT, Large Language Models (LLMs) have received enormous attention in healthcare. Despite their potential benefits, researchers have underscored various ethical implications. While individual instances have drawn much attention, the debate lacks a systematic overview of practical applications currently researched and ethical issues connected to them. Against this background, this work aims to map the ethical landscape surrounding the current stage of deployment of LLMs in medicine and healthcare. Electronic databases and preprint servers were queried using a comprehensive search strategy. Studies were screened and extracted following a modified rapid review approach. Methodological quality was assessed using a hybrid approach. For 53 records, a meta-aggregative synthesis was performed. Four fields of applications emerged and testify to a vivid exploration phase. Advantages of using LLMs are attributed to their capacity in data analysis, personalized information provisioning, support in decision-making, mitigating information loss and enhancing information accessibility. However, we also identifies recurrent ethical concerns connected to fairness, bias, non-maleficence, transparency, and privacy. A distinctive concern is the tendency to produce harmful misinformation or convincingly but inaccurate content. A recurrent plea for ethical guidance and human oversight is evident. Given the variety of use cases, it is suggested that the ethical guidance debate be reframed to focus on defining what constitutes acceptable human oversight across the spectrum of applications. This involves considering diverse settings, varying potentials for harm, and different acceptable thresholds for performance and certainty in healthcare. In addition, a critical inquiry is necessary to determine the extent to which the current experimental use of LLMs is necessary and justified.
14 pages, 3 tables, 2 figures, 2 supplements
References in corpus (4)
- Challenges and Applications of Large Language Models
- Hallucination is Inevitable: An Innate Limitation of Large Language Models
- A Comprehensive Survey of Hallucination Mitigation Techniques in Large Language Models
- Large Language Models in Sport Science & Medicine: Opportunities, Risks and Considerations
Cited by in corpus (10)
- The emergence of Large Language Models (LLM) as a tool in literature reviews: an LLM automated systematic review
- Addressing Bias in Generative AI: Challenges and Research Opportunities in Information Management
- Multi-modal Integration Analysis of Alzheimer's Disease Using Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs
- Development of Application-Specific Large Language Models to Facilitate Research Ethics Review
- Self-Reported Confidence of Large Language Models in Gastroenterology: Analysis of Commercial, Open-Source, and Quantized Models
- What does AI consider praiseworthy?
- Scaling Laws for Moral Machine Judgment in Large Language Models
- Toward Vibe Medicine: A Self-Evolving Multi-Agent Framework for Clinical Decision Support
- Can LLMs Help Allocate Public Health Resources? A Case Study on Childhood Lead Testing
- Ethical AI prompt recommendations in large language models using collaborative filtering