Q-factor: A measure of competition between the topper and the average in percolation and in SOC

Abstract

We define the $Q$-factor in the percolation problem as the quotient of the size of the largest cluster and the average size of all clusters. As the occupation probability $p$ is increased, the $Q$-factor for the system size $L$ grows systematically to its maximum value $Q_{max}(L)$ at a specific value $p_{max}(L)$ and then gradually decays. Our numerical study of site percolation problems on the square, triangular and the simple cubic lattices exhibits that the asymptotic values of $p_{max}$ though close, are distinctly different from the corresponding percolation thresholds of these lattices. We have also shown using the scaling analysis that at $p_{max}$ the value of $Q_{max}(L)$ diverges as $L^d$ ($d$ denoting the dimension of the lattice) as the system size approaches to their asymptotic limit. We have further extended this idea to the non-equilibrium systems such as the sandpile model of self-organized criticality. Here, the $Q(\rho ,L)$-factor is the quotient of the size of the largest avalanche and the cumulative average of the sizes of all the avalanches; $\rho$ being the drop density of the driving mechanism. This study has been prompted by some observations in Sociophysics.

arXiv comment9 pages, 13 figures

References in corpus (6)

• An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output
• Inequality in Societies, Academic Institutions and Science Journals: Gini and k-indices
• Near universal values of social inequality indices in self-organized critical models
• Limiting Value of the Kolkata Index for Social Inequality and a Possible Social Constant
• Bond percolation between $k$ separated points on a square lattice
• Scaling and Kinetic Exchange Like Behavior of Hirsch Index and Total Citation Distributions: Scopus-CiteScore Data Analysis