Developing and Evaluating a Design Method for Positive Artificial Intelligence
arXiv:2402.01499 · doi:10.1017/S0890060424000155
Abstract
As artificial intelligence (AI) continues advancing, ensuring positive societal impacts becomes critical, especially as AI systems become increasingly ubiquitous in various aspects of life. However, developing "AI for good" poses substantial challenges around aligning systems with complex human values. Presently, we lack mature methods for addressing these challenges. This article presents and evaluates the Positive AI design method aimed at addressing this gap. The method provides a human-centered process to translate wellbeing aspirations into concrete practices. First, we explain the method's four key steps: contextualizing, operationalizing, optimizing, and implementing wellbeing supported by continuous measurement for feedback cycles. We then present a multiple case study where novice designers applied the method, revealing strengths and weaknesses related to efficacy and usability. Next, an expert evaluation study assessed the quality of the resulting concepts, rating them moderately high for feasibility, desirability, and plausibility of achieving intended wellbeing benefits. Together, these studies provide preliminary validation of the method's ability to improve AI design, while surfacing areas needing refinement like developing support for complex steps. Proposed adaptations such as examples and evaluation heuristics could address weaknesses. Further research should examine sustained application over multiple projects. This human-centered approach shows promise for realizing the vision of 'AI for Wellbeing' that does not just avoid harm, but actively benefits humanity.
References in corpus (10)
- The Ethics of AI Ethics -- An Evaluation of Guidelines
- Artificial Intelligence, Values and Alignment
- How AI Developers Overcome Communication Challenges in a Multidisciplinary Team: A Case Study
- Meaningful human control: actionable properties for AI system development
- How Different Groups Prioritize Ethical Values for Responsible AI
- Empowering Local Communities Using Artificial Intelligence
- Wellbeing supportive design -- Research-based guidelines for supporting psychological wellbeing in user experience
- Principles to Practices for Responsible AI: Closing the Gap
- IEEE 7010: A New Standard for Assessing the Well-being Implications of Artificial Intelligence
- Axes for Sociotechnical Inquiry in AI Research