A Critical Reflection on the Use of Toxicity Detection Algorithms in Proactive Content Moderation Systems
arXiv:2401.10629 · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2025.103468
Abstract
Toxicity detection algorithms, originally designed with reactive content moderation in mind, are increasingly being deployed into proactive end-user interventions to moderate content. Through a socio-technical lens and focusing on contexts in which they are applied, we explore the use of these algorithms in proactive moderation systems. Placing a toxicity detection algorithm in an imagined virtual mobile keyboard, we critically explore how such algorithms could be used to proactively reduce the sending of toxic content. We present findings from design workshops conducted with four distinct stakeholder groups and find concerns around how contextual complexities may exasperate inequalities around content moderation processes. Whilst only specific user groups are likely to directly benefit from these interventions, we highlight the potential for other groups to misuse them to circumvent detection, validate and gamify hate, and manipulate algorithmic models to exasperate harm.
References in corpus (5)
- 'It's Reducing a Human Being to a Percentage'; Perceptions of Justice in Algorithmic Decisions
- Anyone Can Become a Troll: Causes of Trolling Behavior in Online Discussions
- A Framework of Severity for Harmful Content Online
- Reporting, Reviewing, and Responding to Harassment on Twitter
- Thread With Caution: Proactively Helping Users Assess and Deescalate Tension in Their Online Discussions