Model bias identification for Bayesian calibration of stochastic digital twins of bridges
arXiv:2312.00664 · doi:10.1002/asmb.2897
Abstract
Simulation-based digital twins must provide accurate, robust and reliable digital representations of their physical counterparts. Quantifying the uncertainty in their predictions plays, therefore, a key role in making better-informed decisions that impact the actual system. The update of the simulation model based on data must be then carefully implemented. When applied to complex standing structures such as bridges, discrepancies between the computational model and the real system appear as model bias, which hinders the trustworthiness of the digital twin and increases its uncertainty. Classical Bayesian updating approaches aiming to infer the model parameters often fail at compensating for such model bias, leading to overconfident and unreliable predictions. In this paper, two alternative model bias identification approaches are evaluated in the context of their applicability to digital twins of bridges. A modularized version of Kennedy and O'Hagan's approach and another one based on Orthogonal Gaussian Processes are compared with the classical Bayesian inference framework in a set of representative benchmarks. Additionally, two novel extensions are proposed for such models: the inclusion of noise-aware kernels and the introduction of additional variables not present in the computational model through the bias term. The integration of such approaches in the digital twin corrects the predictions, quantifies their uncertainty, estimates noise from unknown physical sources of error and provides further insight into the system by including additional pre-existing information without modifying the computational model.
arXiv comment32 pages, 21 figures, 9 tables. Submitted for consideration to Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry
References in corpus (8)
- emcee: The MCMC Hammer
- Practical heteroskedastic Gaussian process modeling for large simulation experiments
- Uncertainty quantification for computer models with spatial output using calibration-optimal bases
- Bayesian inference and non-linear extensions of the CIRCE method for quantifying the uncertainty of closure relationships integrated into thermal-hydraulic system codes
- Adaptive numerical designs for the calibration of computer codes
- Bayesian calibration of a numerical code for prediction
- Computer Model Emulation with High-Dimensional Functional Output in Large-Scale Observing System Uncertainty Experiments
- Calibration of inexact computer models with heteroscedastic errors