Interactive AI Alignment: Specification, Process, and Evaluation Alignment
arXiv:2311.00710
Abstract
Modern AI enables a high-level, declarative form of interaction: Users describe the intended outcome they wish an AI to produce, but do not actually create the outcome themselves. In contrast, in traditional user interfaces, users invoke specific operations to create the desired outcome. This paper revisits the basic input-output interaction cycle in light of this declarative style of interaction, and connects concepts in AI alignment to define three objectives for interactive alignment of AI: specification alignment (aligning on what to do), process alignment (aligning on how to do it), and evaluation alignment (assisting users in verifying and understanding what was produced). Using existing systems as examples, we show how these user-centered views of AI alignment can be used descriptively, prescriptively, and as an evaluative aid.
Cited by in corpus (6)
- Selenite: Scaffolding Online Sensemaking with Comprehensive Overviews Elicited from Large Language Models
- Exploring Collaborative GenAI Agents in Synchronous Group Settings: Eliciting Team Perceptions and Design Considerations for the Future of Work
- Intent Tagging: Exploring Micro-Prompting Interactions for Supporting Granular Human-GenAI Co-Creation Workflows
- An Interaction Design Toolkit for Physical Task Guidance with Artificial Intelligence and Mixed Reality
- Abstraction Alignment: Comparing Model-Learned and Human-Encoded Conceptual Relationships
- Meta-ethics and AI: exploring the novel meta-ethical questions in the era of AI