Will Code Remain a Relevant User Interface for End-User Programming with Generative AI Models?
arXiv:2311.00382 · doi:10.1145/3622758.3622882
Abstract
The research field of end-user programming has largely been concerned with helping non-experts learn to code sufficiently well in order to achieve their tasks. Generative AI stands to obviate this entirely by allowing users to generate code from naturalistic language prompts. In this essay, we explore the extent to which "traditional" programming languages remain relevant for non-expert end-user programmers in a world with generative AI. We posit the "generative shift hypothesis": that generative AI will create qualitative and quantitative expansions in the traditional scope of end-user programming. We outline some reasons that traditional programming languages may still be relevant and useful for end-user programmers. We speculate whether each of these reasons might be fundamental and enduring, or whether they may disappear with further improvements and innovations in generative AI. Finally, we articulate a set of implications for end-user programming research, including the possibility of needing to revisit many well-established core concepts, such as Ko's learning barriers and Blackwell's attention investment model.
arXiv commentAdvait Sarkar. 2023. "Will Code Remain a Relevant User Interface for End-User Programming with Generative AI Models?" In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM SIGPLAN International Symposium on New Ideas, New Paradigms, and Reflections on Programming and Software (Onward! '23)
References in corpus (24)
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback
- LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models
- On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models
- Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models
- Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generation
- A Prompt Pattern Catalog to Enhance Prompt Engineering with ChatGPT
- Compute Trends Across Three Eras of Machine Learning
- Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Models
- Understanding the Capabilities, Limitations, and Societal Impact of Large Language Models
- "What It Wants Me To Say": Bridging the Abstraction Gap Between End-User Programmers and Code-Generating Large Language Models
- Will we run out of data? Limits of LLM scaling based on human-generated data
- Exploring Perspectives on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Creativity of Knowledge Work: Beyond Mechanised Plagiarism and Stochastic Parrots
- What is it like to program with artificial intelligence?
- Automatically Generating CS Learning Materials with Large Language Models
- Programming Is Hard -- Or at Least It Used to Be: Educational Opportunities And Challenges of AI Code Generation
- Design Guidelines for Prompt Engineering Text-to-Image Generative Models
- Should Computers Be Easy To Use? Questioning the Doctrine of Simplicity in User Interface Design
- SelfEvolve: A Code Evolution Framework via Large Language Models
- Technical Dimensions of Programming Systems
- Explainable Automated Debugging via Large Language Model-driven Scientific Debugging
- Is explainable AI a race against model complexity?
- Automated Repair of Programs from Large Language Models
- From Words to Code: Harnessing Data for Program Synthesis from Natural Language
- User Perceptions of Automatic Fake News Detection: Can Algorithms Fight Online Misinformation?