Evaluating Three Levels of Quantum Metrics on Quantum-Inspire Hardware

Abstract

With the rise of quantum computing, many quantum devices have been developed and many more devices are being developed as we speak. This begs the question of which device excels at which tasks and how to compare these different quantum devices with one another. The answer is given by quantum metrics, of which many exist today already. Different metrics focus on different aspects of (quantum) devices and choosing the right metric to benchmark one device against another is a difficult choice. In this paper we aim to give an overview of this zoo of metrics by grouping established metrics in three levels: component level, system level and application level. With this characterisation we also mention what the merits and uses are for each of the different levels. In addition, we evaluate these metrics on the Starmon-5 device of Quantum-Inspire through the cloud access, giving the most complete benchmark of a quantum device from an user experience to date.

arXiv comment22 pages, 10 figures

References in corpus (11)

• A Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm
• Towards Quantum Chemistry on a Quantum Computer
• Robust randomized benchmarking of quantum processes
• A programmable two-qubit quantum processor in silicon
• Validating quantum computers using randomized model circuits
• An approximate Fourier transform useful in quantum factoring
• Gate Set Tomography
• Scaling of Dynamical Decoupling for Spin Qubits
• Digital zero noise extrapolation for quantum error mitigation
• Benchmarking quantum co-processors in an application-centric, hardware-agnostic and scalable way
• Evaluating the Q-score of Quantum Annealers

Cited by in corpus (3)

• Distributed Quantum Computing: Applications and Challenges
• Benchmarking Quantum Computers: Towards a Standard Performance Evaluation Approach
• Extending the Q-score to an Application-level Quantum Metric Framework