Three alternative model-building strategies using quasi-Hermitian time-dependent observables
arXiv:2308.07609 · doi:10.3390/sym15081596
Abstract
A plet of non-Hermitian and time-dependent operators (say, , ) can be interpreted as the set of observables characterizing a unitary quantum system. What is required is the existence of a self-adjoint and, in general, time-dependent operator (say, called inner product metric) making the operators quasi-Hermitian, . The theory (called non-Hermitian interaction-picture, NIP) requires a separate description of the evolution of the states (realized, via Schrödinger-type equation, by a generator, say, ) and of the observables themselves (a different generator (say, ) occurs in the related non-Hermitian Heisenberg-type equation). Every (and, in particular, Hamiltonian ) appears isospectral to its hypothetical isospectral and self-adjoint (but, by assumption, prohibitively user-unfriendly) avatar with . In our paper the key role played by identity is shown to imply that there exist just three alternative meaningful implementations of the NIP approach, viz., ``number one'' (a ``dynamical'' strategy based on the knowledge of ), ``number two'' (a ``kinematical'' one, based on the Coriolis force ) and ``number three'' (in the literature, such a construction based on is most popular but, paradoxically, it is also most complicated).
18 pp
References in corpus (9)
- Making Sense of Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians
- Time-dependent version of cryptohermitian quantum theory
- Time-Dependent Pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonians Defining a Unitary Quantum System and Uniqueness of the Metric Operator
- Time evolution of non-Hermitian Hamiltonian systems
- Three-Hilbert-Space Formulation of Quantum Mechanics
- Non-Hermitian Heisenberg representation
- Spectrally equivalent time-dependent double wells and unstable anharmonic oscillators
- Composite quantum Coriolis forces
- Non-stationary quantum mechanics in hybrid non-Hermitian interaction representation