Detecting The Corruption Of Online Questionnaires By Artificial Intelligence
arXiv:2308.07499 · doi:10.3389/frobt.2023.1277635
Abstract
Online questionnaires that use crowd-sourcing platforms to recruit participants have become commonplace, due to their ease of use and low costs. Artificial Intelligence (AI) based Large Language Models (LLM) have made it easy for bad actors to automatically fill in online forms, including generating meaningful text for open-ended tasks. These technological advances threaten the data quality for studies that use online questionnaires. This study tested if text generated by an AI for the purpose of an online study can be detected by both humans and automatic AI detection systems. While humans were able to correctly identify authorship of text above chance level (76 percent accuracy), their performance was still below what would be required to ensure satisfactory data quality. Researchers currently have to rely on the disinterest of bad actors to successfully use open-ended responses as a useful tool for ensuring data quality. Automatic AI detection systems are currently completely unusable. If AIs become too prevalent in submitting responses then the costs associated with detecting fraudulent submissions will outweigh the benefits of online questionnaires. Individual attention checks will no longer be a sufficient tool to ensure good data quality. This problem can only be systematically addressed by crowd-sourcing platforms. They cannot rely on automatic AI detection systems and it is unclear how they can ensure data quality for their paying clients.
References in corpus (10)
- LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models
- ChatGPT and a New Academic Reality: Artificial Intelligence-Written Research Papers and the Ethics of the Large Language Models in Scholarly Publishing
- Out of One, Many: Using Language Models to Simulate Human Samples
- ChatGPT: The End of Online Exam Integrity?
- Quality Control in Crowdsourcing: A Survey of Quality Attributes, Assessment Techniques and Assurance Actions
- How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detection
- ChatGPT or Human? Detect and Explain. Explaining Decisions of Machine Learning Model for Detecting Short ChatGPT-generated Text
- ChatGPT Participates in a Computer Science Exam
- Stylometric Detection of AI-Generated Text in Twitter Timelines
- Comparison of Quality Indicators in User-generated Content Using Social Media and Scholarly Text