paper

Post-CCSD(T) corrections to bond distances and vibrational frequencies: the power of

arXiv:2307.14694 · doi:10.1080/00268976.2023.2252114

Abstract

The importance of post-CCSD(T) corrections as high as CCSDTQ56 for ground-state spectroscopic constants (, , , and ) has been surveyed for a sample of two dozen mostly heavy-atom diatomics spanning a broad range of static correlation strength. While CCSD(T) is known to be an unusually felicitous `Pauling point' between accuracy and computational cost, performance leaves something to be desired for molecules with strong static correlation. We find CCSDT(Q) to be the next `sweet spot' up, of comparable or superior quality to the much more expensive CCSDTQ. A similar comparison applies to CCSDTQ(5) vs. CCSDTQ5, while CCSDTQ5(6) is essentially indistinguishable from CCSDTQ56. A composite of CCSD(T)-X2C/ACV5Z-X2C with [CCSDT(Q) -- CCSD(T)]/cc-pVTZ or even cc-pVDZ basis sets appears highly effective for computational vibrational spectroscopy. Unlike CCSDT(Q) which breaks down for the ozone vibrational frequencies, CCSDT(Q) handles them gracefully.

Mol. Phys., in press [Timothy J. Lee memorial issue]

References in corpus (2)

Cited by in corpus (5)