Against the "nightmare of a mechanically determined universe": Why Bohm was never a Bohmian

Abstract

David Bohm has put forward the first deterministic interpretation of quantum physics, and for this he seems to be regarded as a champion of determinism by physicists (both his contemporaries and the supporters of his interpretation, the so-called "Bohmians") as well as by historians of physics. The standard narrative is that he underwent a "conversion" from being a supporter of Bohr to being a staunch determinist, due to his interaction with Einstein and his commitment to Marxism. Here we show that Bohm actually upheld with continuity throughout his career some philosophical tenets that included a strong rejection of mechanistic determinism. As such, we conclude that Bohm was never a Bohmian and that his philosophical views have been largely misinterpreted.

arXiv comment18 pages + references and appendices

References in corpus (3)

• Karl Popper's Forgotten Role in the Quantum Debate at the Edge between Philosophy and Physics in 1950s and 1960s
• The origins of the research on the foundations of quantum mechanics (and other critical activities) in italy during the 1970s
• Orthodox or Dissident? The Evolution of Bohm's Ontological Reflections in the 1950s