paper

Efficiency of Self-Adjusting Heaps

arXiv:2307.02772

Abstract

Since the invention of the pairing heap by Fredman, Sedgewick, Sleator, and Tarjan, it has been an open question whether this or any other simple "self-adjusting" heap supports decrease-key operations in time, where is the number of heap items. Using powerful new techniques, we answer this question in the affirmative. We prove that both slim and smooth heaps, recently introduced self-adjusting heaps, support heap operations in the following amortized time bounds: for delete-min and delete, for decrease-key, and for all other heap operations, including insert and meld, where is the number of heap items that are eventually deleted: Items inserted but never deleted do not count in the bounds. We also analyze the multipass pairing heap, a variant of pairing heaps. For this heap implementation, we obtain the same bounds except for decrease-key, for which our bound is , where again items that are never deleted do not count in . Our bounds significantly improve the best previously known bounds for all three data structures. For slim and smooth heaps our bounds are tight, since they match lower bounds of Iacono and Özkan.

46 pages, 6 figures. To be published in Transactions on Algorithms

Efficiency of Self-Adjusting Heaps · wovepaper