Why Are Conversational Assistants Still Black Boxes? The Case For Transparency

Abstract

Much has been written about privacy in the context of conversational and voice assistants. Yet, there have been remarkably few developments in terms of the actual privacy offered by these devices. But how much of this is due to the technical and design limitations of speech as an interaction modality? In this paper, we set out to reframe the discussion on why commercial conversational assistants do not offer meaningful privacy and transparency by demonstrating how they \emph{could}. By instrumenting the open-source voice assistant Mycroft to capture audit trails for data access, we demonstrate how such functionality could be integrated into big players in the sector like Alexa and Google Assistant. We show that this problem can be solved with existing technology and open standards and is thus fundamentally a business decision rather than a technical limitation.

arXiv commentTo appear in the Proceedings of the 2023 ACM conference on Conversational User Interfaces (CUI 23)

References in corpus (4)

• Informing the Design of Privacy-Empowering Tools for the Connected Home
• A Methodology and Software Architecture to Support Explainability-by-Design
• When It's Not Worth the Paper It's Written On: A Provocation on the Certification of Skills in the Alexa and Google Assistant Ecosystems
• Predicting Privacy Preferences for Smart Devices as Norms