paper

Sub-25-dimensional counterexamples to Borsuk's conjecture in the Leech lattice?

arXiv:2305.06283

Abstract

In 1933, Karol Borsuk asked whether each bounded set in the -dimensional Euclidean space can be divided into +1 parts of smaller diameter. Because it would not make sense otherwise, one usually assumes that he just forgot to require that the whole set contains at least two points. The hypothesis that the answer to that question is positive became famous under the name \emph{Borsuk's conjecture}. Counterexamples are known for any , since 2013. Let be the (original, unscaled) Leech lattice, a now very well-known infinite discrete vector set in the 24-dimensional Euclidean space. The smallest norm of nonzero vectors in is . Let be the set of the 196560 vectors in having this norm. For each , is in . Let be the set of all subsets of that for each in contain either or . Each element of has the same diameter . For dimensions one can analogously construct respective and from laminated -dimensional sublattices of . For uniformity, let , and . If is divisible into at most parts of diameter below then this applies to all elements of , too. I have checked that this is the case for all . For from 22 to 24, the minimum number of parts of diameter below that I was able to divide into are 25, 29 and 34, resp. The source package of this article contains a data file encoding an element of that I can not divide into less than 29 parts of smaller diameter.

5 pages; v2: progress for n=22, correction in (2) in section 3; v3: progress for six values of n; v4: potential counterexample added to the source package; v5: effort description extended, progress for n=14 and n=20; v6: effort description corrected, progress for n=16, n=19, n=24 and the potential counterexample