Robustness of controlled Hamiltonian approaches to unitary quantum gates
arXiv:2304.14667 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.108.022423
Abstract
We examine the effectiveness and resilience of achieving quantum gates employing three approaches stemming from quantum control methods: counterdiabatic driving, Floquet engineering, and inverse engineering. We critically analyse their performance in terms of the gate infidelity, the associated resource overhead based on energetic cost, the susceptibility to time-keeping errors, and the degradation under environmental noise. Despite significant differences in the dynamical path taken, we find a broadly consistent behavior across the three approaches in terms of the efficacy of implementing the target gate and the resource overhead. Furthermore, we establish that the functional form of the control fields plays a crucial role in determining how faithfully a gate operation is achieved. Our results are demonstrated for single qubit gates, with particular focus on the Hadamard gate, and we discuss the extension to -qubit operations.
10 pages, 4 figures. Updated to published version
References in corpus (16)
- Lewis-Riesenfeld invariants and transitionless tracking algorithm
- Fast population transfer engineering of three-level systems
- Quantum technologies need a Quantum Energy Initiative
- Universal Work Fluctuations during Shortcuts To Adiabaticity by Counterdiabatic Driving
- Thermodynamic cost of creating correlations
- Counterdiabatic Optimised Local Driving
- Universal Bound on Energy Cost of Bit Reset in Finite Time
- Evidence of Kardar-Parisi-Zhang scaling on a digital quantum simulator
- Energetics of a Single Qubit Gate
- Reverse engineering of a Hamiltonian by designing the evolution operators
- Optimization and experimental realization of the quantum permutation algorithm
- Machine-learning assisted quantum control in random environment
- Generalized transitionless quantum driving for open quantum systems
- Finite-time two-spin quantum Otto engines: shortcuts to adiabaticity vs. irreversibility
- Energy requirement for implementing unitary gates on energy-unbounded systems
- Robust control of linear systems and shortcut to adiabaticity based on superoscillations
Cited by in corpus (6)
- Introduction to Theoretical and Experimental aspects of Quantum Optimal Control
- Efficiency Optimization in Quantum Computing: Balancing Thermodynamics and Computational Performance
- Taming quantum systems: A tutorial for using shortcuts-to-adiabaticity, quantum optimal control, and reinforcement learning
- Speeding up Quantum Annealing with Engineered Dephasing
- Correcting noisy quantum gates with shortcuts to adiabaticity
- An automated geometric space curve approach for designing dynamically corrected gates