Enhancing the SST Turbulence Model with Symbolic Regression: A Generalizable and Interpretable Data-Driven Approach
arXiv:2304.11347 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevFluids.8.084604
Abstract
Turbulence modeling within the RANS equations' framework is essential in engineering due to its high efficiency. Field inversion and machine learning (FIML) techniques have improved RANS models' predictive capabilities for separated flows. However, FIML-generated models often lack interpretability, limiting physical understanding and manual improvements based on prior knowledge. Additionally, these models may struggle with generalization in flow fields distinct from the training set. This study addresses these issues by employing symbolic regression (SR) to derive an analytical relationship between the correction factor of the baseline turbulence model and local flow variables, enhancing the baseline model's ability to predict separated flow across diverse test cases. The shear-stress-transport (SST) model undergoes field inversion on a curved backward-facing step (CBFS) case to obtain the corrective factor field beta, and SR is used to derive a symbolic map between local flow features and beata. The SR-derived analytical function is integrated into the original SST model, resulting in the SST-SR model. The SST-SR model's generalization capabilities are demonstrated by its successful predictions of separated flow on various test cases, including 2D-bump cases with varying heights, periodic hill case where separation is dominated by geometric features, and the three-dimensional Ahmed-body case. In these tests, the model accurately predicts flow fields, showing its effectiveness in cases completely different from the training set. The Ahmed-body case, in particular, highlights the model's ability to predict the three-dimensional massively separated flows. When applied to a turbulent boundary layer with Re_L=1.0E7, the SST-SR model predicts wall friction coefficient and log layer comparably to the original SST model, maintaining the attached boundary layer prediction performance.
37 pages, 46 figures
References in corpus (5)
- Feature selection and processing of turbulence modeling based on an artificial neural network
- Data-driven turbulence modeling in separated flows considering physical mechanism analysis
- Data augmented turbulence modeling for three-dimensional separation flows
- An iterative data-driven turbulence modeling framework based on Reynolds stress representation
- Numerical Simulation of Iced Wing Using Separating Shear Layer Fixed Turbulence Models
Cited by in corpus (5)
- Data-driven Turbulence Modeling for Separated Flows Considering Non-Local Effect
- Progressive Mixture-of-Experts with autoencoder routing for continual RANS turbulence modelling
- Numerical Simulation of Three-dimensional High-Lift Configurations Using Data-Driven Turbulence Model
- Interpretable data-driven turbulence modeling for separated flows using symbolic regression with unit constraints
- Data-driven Augmentation of a Turbulence Model in Three dimensional Separated Flows