Can we trust the evaluation on ChatGPT?
arXiv:2303.12767 · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.trustnlp-1.5
Abstract
ChatGPT, the first large language model (LLM) with mass adoption, has demonstrated remarkable performance in numerous natural language tasks. Despite its evident usefulness, evaluating ChatGPT's performance in diverse problem domains remains challenging due to the closed nature of the model and its continuous updates via Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF). We highlight the issue of data contamination in ChatGPT evaluations, with a case study of the task of stance detection. We discuss the challenge of preventing data contamination and ensuring fair model evaluation in the age of closed and continuously trained models.
References in corpus (5)
- ChatGPT: Jack of all trades, master of none
- Mathematical Capabilities of ChatGPT
- How would Stance Detection Techniques Evolve after the Launch of ChatGPT?
- What Can Transformers Learn In-Context? A Case Study of Simple Function Classes
- Large Language Models Can Be Used to Estimate the Latent Positions of Politicians