paper

is not a CI-group

arXiv:2303.08742

Abstract

A Cayley graph Cay has the CI (Cayley Isomorphism) property if for every isomorphic graph Cay, there is a group automorphism of such that . The DCI (Directed Cayley Isomorphism) property is defined analogously on digraphs. A group is a CI-group if every Cayley graph on has the CI property, and is a DCI-group if every Cayley digraph on has the DCI property. Since a graph is a special type of digraph, this means that every DCI-group is a CI-group, and if a group is not a CI-group then it is not a DCI-group, but there are well-known examples of groups that are CI-groups but not DCI-groups. In 2009, Spiga showed that is not a DCI-group, by producing a digraph that does not have the DCI property. He also showed that is a DCI-group (and therefore also a CI-group). Until recently the question of whether there are elementary abelian -groups that are not CI-groups remained open. In a recent preprint with Dave Witte Morris, we showed that is not a CI-group. In this paper we show that with slight modifications, the underlying undirected graph of order described by Spiga is does not have the CI property, so is not a CI-group.

10 pages