Feature Perturbation Augmentation for Reliable Evaluation of Importance Estimators in Neural Networks

Abstract

Post-hoc explanation methods attempt to make the inner workings of deep neural networks more interpretable. However, since a ground truth is in general lacking, local post-hoc interpretability methods, which assign importance scores to input features, are challenging to evaluate. One of the most popular evaluation frameworks is to perturb features deemed important by an interpretability method and to measure the change in prediction accuracy. Intuitively, a large decrease in prediction accuracy would indicate that the explanation has correctly quantified the importance of features with respect to the prediction outcome (e.g., logits). However, the change in the prediction outcome may stem from perturbation artifacts, since perturbed samples in the test dataset are out of distribution (OOD) compared to the training dataset and can therefore potentially disturb the model in an unexpected manner. To overcome this challenge, we propose feature perturbation augmentation (FPA) which creates and adds perturbed images during the model training. Through extensive computational experiments, we demonstrate that FPA makes deep neural networks (DNNs) more robust against perturbations. Furthermore, training DNNs with FPA demonstrate that the sign of importance scores may explain the model more meaningfully than has previously been assumed. Overall, FPA is an intuitive data augmentation technique that improves the evaluation of post-hoc interpretability methods.

References in corpus (7)

• Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples
• Explaining Deep Neural Networks and Beyond: A Review of Methods and Applications
• Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbation
• A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networks
• Learning how to explain neural networks: PatternNet and PatternAttribution
• Enforcing Interpretability and its Statistical Impacts: Trade-offs between Accuracy and Interpretability
• Framework for Evaluating Faithfulness of Local Explanations