A Human-Centered Review of Algorithms in Decision-Making in Higher Education

Abstract

The use of algorithms for decision-making in higher education is steadily growing, promising cost-savings to institutions and personalized service for students but also raising ethical challenges around surveillance, fairness, and interpretation of data. To address the lack of systematic understanding of how these algorithms are currently designed, we reviewed an extensive corpus of papers proposing algorithms for decision-making in higher education. We categorized them based on input data, computational method, and target outcome, and then investigated the interrelations of these factors with the application of human-centered lenses: theoretical, participatory, or speculative design. We found that the models are trending towards deep learning, and increased use of student personal data and protected attributes, with the target scope expanding towards automated decisions. However, despite the associated decrease in interpretability and explainability, current development predominantly fails to incorporate human-centered lenses. We discuss the challenges with these trends and advocate for a human-centered approach.

References in corpus (2)

• An Uncommon Task: Participatory Design in Legal AI
• Causal Inference in Higher Education: Building Better Curriculums

Cited by in corpus (4)

• Are We Asking the Right Questions?: Designing for Community Stakeholders' Interactions with AI in Policing
• "This is not a data problem": Algorithms and Power in Public Higher Education in Canada
• A Human-Centered Review of Algorithms in Homelessness Research
• The Datafication of Care in Public Homelessness Services