Conversational Automated Program Repair

Abstract

Automated Program Repair (APR) can help developers automatically generate patches for bugs. Due to the impressive performance obtained using Large Pre-Trained Language Models (LLMs) on many code related tasks, researchers have started to directly use LLMs for APR. However, prior approaches simply repeatedly sample the LLM given the same constructed input/prompt created from the original buggy code, which not only leads to generating the same incorrect patches repeatedly but also miss the critical information in testcases. To address these limitations, we propose conversational APR, a new paradigm for program repair that alternates between patch generation and validation in a conversational manner. In conversational APR, we iteratively build the input to the model by combining previously generated patches with validation feedback. As such, we leverage the long-term context window of LLMs to not only avoid generating previously incorrect patches but also incorporate validation feedback to help the model understand the semantic meaning of the program under test. We evaluate 10 different LLM including the newly developed ChatGPT model to demonstrate the improvement of conversational APR over the prior LLM for APR approach.

Cited by in corpus (7)

• Summary of ChatGPT-Related Research and Perspective Towards the Future of Large Language Models
• Practical Program Repair in the Era of Large Pre-trained Language Models
• A Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of LLM-Based Explainable Fault Localization
• Copiloting the Copilots: Fusing Large Language Models with Completion Engines for Automated Program Repair
• Revisiting the Plastic Surgery Hypothesis via Large Language Models
• Fully Autonomous Programming using Iterative Multi-Agent Debugging with Large Language Models
• Assessing the Latent Automated Program Repair Capabilities of Large Language Models using Round-Trip Translation