AI model GPT-3 (dis)informs us better than humans
arXiv:2301.11924 · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adh1850
Abstract
Artificial intelligence is changing the way we create and evaluate information, and this is happening during an infodemic, which has been having dramatic effects on global health. In this paper we evaluate whether recruited individuals can distinguish disinformation from accurate information, structured in the form of tweets, and determine whether a tweet is organic or synthetic, i.e., whether it has been written by a Twitter user or by the AI model GPT-3. Our results show that GPT-3 is a double-edge sword, which, in comparison with humans, can produce accurate information that is easier to understand, but can also produce more compelling disinformation. We also show that humans cannot distinguish tweets generated by GPT-3 from tweets written by human users. Starting from our results, we reflect on the dangers of AI for disinformation, and on how we can improve information campaigns to benefit global health.
dataset and software: https://osf.io/9ntgf 29 pages, 4 figures, 13 supplementary figures
Cited by in corpus (9)
- Generative AI
- On the Conversational Persuasiveness of Large Language Models: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- Anatomy of an AI-powered malicious social botnet
- Fact-checking information from large language models can decrease headline discernment
- Large language models for automated scholarly paper review: A survey
- Public Opinions About Copyright for AI-Generated Art: The Role of Egocentricity, Competition, and Experience
- LLM-Generated Fake News Induces Truth Decay in News Ecosystem: A Case Study on Neural News Recommendation
- ChatGPT as a commenter to the news: can LLMs generate human-like opinions?
- An Experimental Comparison of the Most Popular Approaches to Fake News Detection