Contra Bellum: Bell's theorem as a confusion of languages

Abstract

Bell's theorem is a conflict of mathematical predictions formulated within an infinite hierarchy of mathematical models. Inequalities formulated at level $k\in \mathbb{Z}$, are violated by probabilities at level $k+1$. We are inclined to think that $k=0$ corresponds to the the classical world, while the quantum one is $k=1$. However, as the $k=0$ inequalities are violated by $k=1$ probabilities, the same relation holds between $k=1$ inequalities violated by $k=2$ probabilities, $k=-1$ inequalities, violated by $k=0$ probabilities, and so forth. Accepting the logic of the Bell theorem, can we prove by induction that nothing exists?

References in corpus (4)

• Arithmetic loophole in Bell's theorem: An overlooked threat to entangled-state quantum cryptography
• Introduction to Projective Arithmetics
• Imitating quantum probabilities: Beyond Bell's theorem and Tsirelson bounds
• Cosmic-time quantum mechanics and the passage-of-time problem

Cited by in corpus (2)

• On the Relativity of Quantumness as Implied by Relativity of Arithmetic and Probability
• Inequality-free proof of Bell's theorem