The importance of tight basis functions for heavy p-block oxides and halides: a parallel with tight functions in the second row
arXiv:2301.10098 · doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.3c00544
Abstract
It is well-known that both wavefunction ab initio and DFT calculations on second-row compounds exhibit anomalously slow basis set convergence unless the basis sets are augmented with additional `tight' (high-exponent) functions, as in the cc-pV()Z and aug-cc-pV()Z basis sets. This has been rationalized as being necessary for a better description of the low-lying orbital, which as the oxidation state increases sinks low enough to act as a back-donation acceptor from chalcogen and halogen lone pairs. This prompts the question whether a similar phenomenon exists for the isovalent compounds of the heavy p-block. We show that for the fourth and fifth row, this is the case, but this time for tight functions enhancing the description of the low-lying and Rydberg orbitals, respectively. In the third-row heavy block, the orbitals are too far up, while the orbitals are adequately covered by the basis functions already present to describe the subvalence orbitals.
arXiv commentCC:BY 4.0 Open Access (Krishnan Raghavachari festschrift)
References in corpus (6)
- Correlation consistent valence basis sets for use with the Stuttgart-Dresden-Bonn relativistic effective core potentials: the atoms Ga-Kr and In-Xe
- W4 theory for computational thermochemistry: in pursuit of confident sub-kJ/mol predictions
- Alkali and Alkaline Earth Metal Compounds: Core-Valence Basis Sets and Importance of Subvalence Correlation
- Heats of formation of perchloric acid, HClO, and perchloric anhydride, ClO. Probing the limits of W1 and W2 theory
- The heat of atomization of sulfur trioxide, SO - a benchmark for computational thermochemistry
- Electron Correlation: Nature's Weird and Wonderful Chemical Glue