Response to `Comment on "Quantum correlations are weaved by the spinors of the Euclidean primitives"'
arXiv:2211.09867 · doi:10.1098/rsos.220147
Abstract
In this paper I respond to a critique of one of my papers previously published in the Royal Society Open Science entitled "Quantum correlations are weaved by the spinors of the Euclidean primitives." Without engaging with the geometrical framework presented in my paper, the critique incorrectly claims that there are mathematical errors in it. I demonstrate that the critique is based on a series of misunderstandings, and refute each of its claims of error. I also bring out a number of logical, mathematical, and conceptual errors from the critique and the critiques it relies on.
arXiv comment49 pages, Invited reply to comment arXiv:2106.03169 [quant-ph] on the earlier paper arXiv:1806.02392 [quant-ph], published by invitation of the editors of `Royal Society Open Science.' For complete transparency of the peer review process, the Review History of the paper (both rounds) is included, which is also accessible from the journal's webpage for the paper
References in corpus (9)
- Hidden Variables and the Two Theorems of John Bell
- Exactly Soluble Sector of Quantum Gravity
- Quantum correlations are weaved by the spinors of the Euclidean primitives
- Bell's Theorem Versus Local Realism in a Quaternionic Model of Physical Space
- Macroscopic Observability of Spinorial Sign Changes under 2pi Rotations
- Dr. Bertlmann's Socks in the Quaternionic World of Ambidextral Reality
- Reply to "Comment on 'Dr. Bertlmann's Socks in a Quaternionic World of Ambidextral Reality'"
- Local origins of quantum correlations rooted in geometric algebra
- Reply to "Comment on 'Bell's Theorem Versus Local Realism in a Quaternionic Model of Physical Space'"