Historical infinitesimalists and modern historiography of infinitesimals
arXiv:2210.14504 · doi:10.14708/am.v16i1.7169
Abstract
In the history of infinitesimal calculus, we trace innovation from Leibniz to Cauchy and reaction from Berkeley to Mansion and beyond. We explore 19th century infinitesimal lores, including the approaches of Simeon-Denis Poisson, Gaspard-Gustave de Coriolis, and Jean-Nicolas Noel. We examine contrasting historiographic approaches to such lores, in the work of Laugwitz, Schubring, Spalt, and others, and address a recent critique by Archibald et al. We argue that the element of contingency in this history is more prominent than many modern historians seem willing to acknowledge.
arXiv comment60 pages
References in corpus (13)
- Almost equal: Method of adequality from Diophantus to Fermat and beyond
- Tools, objects, and chimeras: Connes on the role of hyperreals in mathematics
- Leibniz's Laws of Continuity and Homogeneity
- Cauchy's continuum
- Infinitesimal analysis without the Axiom of Choice
- Two-track depictions of Leibniz's fictions
- Leibniz on bodies and infinities: rerum natura and mathematical fictions
- To be or not to be constructive, that is not the question
- Klein vs Mehrtens: restoring the reputation of a great modern
- Is pluralism in the history of mathematics possible?
- A two-track tour of Cauchy's Cours
- Three case studies in current Leibniz scholarship
- Constructing nonstandard hulls and Loeb measures in internal set theories