Combining cosmic shear data with correlated photo-$z$ uncertainties: constraints from DESY1 and HSC-DR1

Abstract

An accurate calibration of the source redshift distribution $p(z)$ is a key aspect in the analysis of cosmic shear data. This, one way or another, requires the use of spectroscopic or high-quality photometric samples. However, the difficulty to obtain colour-complete spectroscopic samples matching the depth of weak lensing catalogs means that the analyses of different cosmic shear datasets often use the same samples for redshift calibration. This introduces a source of statistical and systematic uncertainty that is highly correlated across different weak lensing datasets, and which must be accurately characterised and propagated in order to obtain robust cosmological constraints from their combination. In this paper we introduce a method to quantify and propagate the uncertainties on the source redshift distribution in two different surveys sharing the same calibrating sample. The method is based on an approximate analytical marginalisation of the $p(z)$ statistical uncertainties and the correlated marginalisation of residual systematics. We apply this method to the combined analysis of cosmic shear data from the DESY1 data release and the HSC-DR1 data, using the COSMOS 30-band catalog as a common redshift calibration sample. We find that, although there is significant correlation in the uncertainties on the redshift distributions of both samples, this does not change the final constraints on cosmological parameters significantly. The same is true also for the impact of residual systematic uncertainties from the errors in the COSMOS 30-band photometric redshifts. Additionally, we show that these effects will still be negligible in Stage-IV datasets. Finally, the combination of DESY1 and HSC-DR1 allows us to constrain the ``clumpiness'' parameter to $S_8=0.768_{-0.017}^{+0.021}$. This corresponds to a $\sim \sqrt{2}$ improvement in uncertainties with respect to either DES or HSC alone.

arXiv comment32 pages, 12 figures, comments welcome; v2: minor changes, accepted version in JCAP

References in corpus (63)

• SciPy 1.0--Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python
• Astropy: A Community Python Package for Astronomy
• The NumPy array: a structure for efficient numerical computation
• Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters
• The Astropy Project: Building an inclusive, open-science project and status of the v2.0 core package
• Efficient Computation of CMB anisotropies in closed FRW models
• LSST: from Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products
• MultiNest: an efficient and robust Bayesian inference tool for cosmology and particle physics
• Weak Gravitational Lensing
• Stable clustering, the halo model and nonlinear cosmological power spectra
• Multimodal nested sampling: an efficient and robust alternative to MCMC methods for astronomical data analysis
• Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing
• Bayesian photometric redshift estimation
• The COSMOS2015 Catalog: Exploring the 1<z<6 Universe with half a million galaxies
• Importance Nested Sampling and the MultiNest Algorithm
• KiDS-1000 Cosmology: Cosmic shear constraints and comparison between two point statistics
• KiDS-1000 Cosmology: Multi-probe weak gravitational lensing and spectroscopic galaxy clustering constraints
• Planck 2018 results. VIII. Gravitational lensing
• Cobaya: Code for Bayesian Analysis of hierarchical physical models
• Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Cosmic Shear
• Cosmology from cosmic shear power spectra with Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam first-year data
• Dark energy constraints from cosmic shear power spectra: impact of intrinsic alignments on photometric redshift requirements
• Determination of Inflationary Observables by Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropy Experiments
• Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmology from Cosmic Shear and Robustness to Data Calibration
• A unified pseudo-$C_{\ell }$ framework
• Core Cosmology Library: Precision Cosmological Predictions for LSST
• Calibrating Redshift Distributions Beyond Spectroscopic Limits with Cross-Correlations
• Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear two-point correlation functions with HSC survey first-year data
• Likelihood Analysis of CMB Temperature and Polarization Power Spectra
• The first-year shear catalog of the Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam SSP Survey
• Estimating the Redshift Distribution of Faint Galaxy Samples
• Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Weak Lensing Shape Catalogues
• Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Redshift distributions of the weak lensing source galaxies
• A non-linear solution to the $S_8$ tension?
• The Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope: 100 Hubbles for the 2020s
• KiDS+VIKING-450 and DES-Y1 combined: Cosmology with cosmic shear
• Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Galaxy clustering for combined probes
• Precision calculations of the cosmic shear power spectrum projection
• Photometric Redshift Calibration with Self Organising Maps
• Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Galaxy-Galaxy Lensing
• Cosmological constraints from the tomographic cross-correlation of DESI Luminous Red Galaxies and Planck CMB lensing
• Recovering Redshift Distributions with Cross-Correlations: Pushing The Boundaries
• Using Galaxy Two-point Correlation Functions to Determine the Redshift Distributions of Galaxies Binned by Photometric Redshift
• Consistent lensing and clustering in a low-$S_8$ Universe with BOSS, DES Year 3, HSC Year 1 and KiDS-1000
• The growth of density perturbations in the last $\sim$10 billion years from tomographic large-scale structure data
• Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Clustering Redshifts -- Calibration of the Weak Lensing Source Redshift Distributions with redMaGiC and BOSS/eBOSS
• Cosmological Analysis of Three-Dimensional BOSS Galaxy Clustering and Planck CMB Lensing Cross Correlations via Lagrangian Perturbation Theory
• Reconstructing Redshift Distributions with Cross-Correlations: Tests and an Optimized Recipe
• Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: cosmological constraints from the analysis of cosmic shear in harmonic space
• Tomographic galaxy clustering with the Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam first year public data release
• Relaxing the ${\sigma }_8$-tension through running vacuum in the Universe
• The PAU Survey: An improved photo-$z$ sample in the COSMOS field
• Disconnected pseudo-$C_{\ell }$ covariances for projected large-scale structure data
• Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Joint Analysis of Galaxy Clustering, Galaxy Lensing, and CMB Lensing Two-point Functions
• Cosmic shear power spectra in practice
• A Unified Analysis of Four Cosmic Shear Surveys
• Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Exploiting small-scale information with lensing shear ratios
• The impact of spectroscopic incompleteness in direct calibration of redshift distributions for weak lensing surveys
• Propagating sample variance uncertainties in redshift calibration: simulations, theory and application to the COSMOS2015 data
• Photometric Redshift Uncertainties in Weak Gravitational Lensing Shear Analysis: Models and Marginalization
• Analytic marginalization of $N(z)$ uncertainties in tomographic galaxy surveys
• The PAU Survey: Operation and orchestration of multi-band survey data
• Source Distributions of Cosmic Shear Surveys in Efficiency Space

Cited by in corpus (4)

• Cosmic shear with small scales: DES-Y3, KiDS-1000 and HSC-DR1
• A Unified Catalog-level Reanalysis of Stage-III Cosmic Shear Surveys
• Analytical marginalisation over photometric redshift uncertainties in cosmic shear analyses
• Constraints on dark matter and astrophysics from tomographic $\gamma$-ray cross-correlations