An empirical method for mitigating an excess up-scattering mass bias on the weak lensing mass estimates for shear-selected cluster samples
arXiv:2210.07446 · doi:10.1093/pasj/psac085
Abstract
An excess up-scattering mass bias on a weak lensing cluster mass estimate is a statistical bias that an observed weak lensing mass () of a cluster of galaxies is, in a statistical sense, larger than its true mass () because of a higher chance of up-scattering than that of down-scattering due to random noises in a weak lensing cluster shear profile. This non-symmetric scattering probability is caused by a monotonically decreasing cluster mass function with increasing mass. We examine this bias (defined by ) in weak lensing shear-selected clusters, and present an empirical method for mitigating it. In so doing, we perform the standard weak lensing mass estimate of realistic mock clusters, and find that the weak lensing mass estimate based on the standard analysis gives a statistically correct confidence intervals, but resulting best-fitting masses are biased high on average. Our correction method uses the framework of the standard Bayesian statistics with the prior of the probability distribution of the cluster mass and concentration parameter from recent empirical models. We test our correction method using mock weak lensing clusters, and find that the method works well with resulting corrected -bin averaged mass biases being close to unity within percent. We applied the correction method to weak lensing shear-selected cluster sample of Hamana et al. (2020), and present bias-corrected weak lensing cluster masses.
arXiv comment16 pages, 10 figures, version matches that published in PASJ. The bias corrected masses of HSC survey S19A shear selected clusters (Oguri et al 2021) are available from http://th.nao.ac.jp/MEMBER/hamanatk/HSC19aWLCusters/s19a_TI05_exupscat_bias_corr_ML_MP.dat
References in corpus (50)
- A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering
- HEALPix -- a Framework for High Resolution Discretization, and Fast Analysis of Data Distributed on the Sphere
- Nine-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Parameter Results
- LSST: from Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products
- Cosmological Parameters from Observations of Galaxy Clusters
- The Hyper Suprime-Cam SSP Survey: Overview and Survey Design
- The Large Scale Bias of Dark Matter Halos: Numerical Calibration and Model Tests
- Formation of Galaxy Clusters
- A Method for Weak Lensing Observations
- Subaru Prime Focus Camera -- Suprime-Cam --
- First Data Release of the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program
- COLOSSUS: A python toolkit for cosmology, large-scale structure, and dark matter halos
- Detection of (dark) matter concentrations via weak gravitational lensing
- Photometric Redshifts for Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program Data Release 1
- On the Accuracy of Weak Lensing Cluster Mass Reconstructions
- Combining Strong and Weak Gravitational Lensing in Abell 1689
- Weighing simulated galaxy clusters using lensing and X-ray
- The galaxy cluster mass scale and its impact on cosmological constraints from the cluster population
- An accurate physical model for halo concentrations
- LoCuSS: Subaru Weak Lensing Study of 30 Galaxy Clusters
- The Surprisingly Steep Mass Profile of Abell 1689, from a Lensing Analysis of Subaru Images
- The first-year shear catalog of the Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam SSP Survey
- How well can we determine cluster mass profiles from weak lensing?
- Comparison of weak lensing masses and X-ray properties of galaxy clusters
- A cluster finding algorithm based on the multiband identification of red sequence galaxies
- An optically-selected cluster catalog at redshift 0.1<z<1.1 from the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program S16A data
- Analytic models of plausible gravitational lens potentials
- Searching for massive clusters in weak lensing surveys
- Can the Steep Mass Profile of A1689 Be Explained by a Triaxial Dark Halo?
- Full-sky Gravitational Lensing Simulation for Large-area Galaxy Surveys and Cosmic Microwave Background Experiments
- Detailed cluster lensing profiles at large radii and the impact on cluster weak lensing studies
- Cluster-galaxy weak lensing
- Combining Lens Distortion and Depletion to Map the Mass Distribution of A1689
- A Statistical Study of Weak Lensing by Triaxial Dark Matter Halos: Consequences for Parameter Estimation
- Weak-Lensing Mass Calibration of ACTPol Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Clusters with the Hyper Suprime-Cam Survey
- Mock weak lensing analysis of simulated galaxy clusters: bias and scatter in mass and concentration
- Searching for dark matter halos in the Suprime-Cam 2 sq deg field
- Source Selection for Cluster Weak Lensing Measurements in the Hyper Suprime-Cam Survey
- Weak lensing Analysis of X-Ray-selected XXL Galaxy Groups and Clusters with Subaru HSC Data
- The eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS): X-ray Observable-to-Mass-and-Redshift Relations of Galaxy Clusters and Groups with Weak-Lensing Mass Calibration from the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program Survey
- A large sample of shear selected clusters from the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program S16A wide field mass maps
- Cosmic variance of the galaxy cluster weak lensing signal
- Scatter and bias in weak lensing selected clusters
- Probing cosmology with weak lensing selected clusters I: Halo approach and all-sky simulations
- Cosmological constraints from Subaru weak lensing cluster counts
- XXL Survey groups and clusters in the Hyper Suprime-Cam Survey. Scaling relations between X-ray properties and weak lensing mass
- Hundreds of weak lensing shear-selected clusters from the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program S19A data
- Weak lensing clusters from HSC survey first-year data: Mitigating the dilution effect of foreground and cluster member galaxies
- Mass Bias of Weak Lensing Shear-selected Galaxy Cluster Samples
- The eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS): A complete census of X-ray properties of Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam weak lensing shear-selected clusters in the eFEDS footprint